’WPCŹ āwē8Ö<æų {’j[p šHlĆąÆ^ŻŽŪßO 3¤óŽ€A_€øĀy'ńVŖīœłgcʁ[Ž×Ź9ļĄ_ĻuņüŒķi­¾Ŗ¢ T}§yŪīœp{ŃßØU†Œ÷ģ½=°ŃZj EZį^zd¬ėcŁ„éŖ”«ƒ„W•a„­÷R² Sœ-ęK:»ŁnXRĀ ]Ių7"#‡7ū[vJ>öūJ_VĶÄĮjŒ³—ż/ŁĪܟäšį5>צ£ Õ®—zćĒŸåL°L"j2_Ļ! smŽ2ų#Å/ä7Ņ Dń)ą÷o”')m¼ćtņļ‰ėB§=Ō6.eb”Ńk–S.-ƒ?²·Ü9xé`Äńżz²Ń`| 6~¼ŠŃäēŚ\„ę–Āk¾‘[ōuŽŪ–’é^0dBČ:ŌōS:œ« 5øu?†kĄŃ-™‡uÄ–ž±nŌŒĀžŠ_nn>,Ļ4„‹¶i %§umorņļĶŲż›ėŽŁT ERV¤+‰Ÿ£SŲ%ū7Ņ%­ēšįØ#_×Õ_Gg'ß"[˜Ž];. jNÕõ£IŠėį€{- č°…‘óę¬Nˆ~įŁs³¦ĄJƒf # ŒUN— %å 0(ėLw@_4Ÿ³Ā˜Canon BJ-200BJ200…ą%33%…ą0 (  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($””C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT ųłśūDüżgžD’C«Ņ |xŻ ƒ!ŻŻ  Ż›Ó  ÓÓ  ÓńżńœńżńńżńŃ7€fXXdķXXdķ7Ńńżńą  ąą ` ąą ø ąą  ąą h ąą Ą ąą  ąą p ąą Č ąą  ąą x ąœńžńSally›€Lefebvre›Ģ›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ąEnglish›€201›Ģ›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ąFinal›€Portfolio›Ģ›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ą›ą Š ąMay›€12,›€1995ńžńńžń›ńžńńžń¹ńžń›¹Ó(ÓÓ  ӜńžńĢ›Ģńžń›ÓӜńžńASPARTńžńń’ńASPARTń’ńAME:›€WHAT€YOU€DONššT€KNOW€CAN€HURT€YOUĢą @ ąą @ ąą @ ąÓ  Óą  ąIf€a€product€is€approved€by€the€Food€and€Drug€Administration€(FDA)€and€composed€ofĻnatural€ingredients,€would€you€assume€it€is€safe€to€consume?€€If€the€same€product€is€an€artificialĻsweetener,€would€you€assume€it€helps€control€your€weight?€€Millions€of€people€use€aspartame,Ļthe€artificial€sweetener€known€as€NutraSweetš)š,€with€these€assumptions€in€mind.€€AspartameĻcan€be€found€in€thousands€of€products€such€as€diet€soda,€yogurt,€and€over„the„counter€medicinesĻto€name€a€few.€€However,€aspartameššs€tainted€history€of€approval€and€potentially€toxicĻingredients€cast€a€serious€doubt€on€the€safety€of€this€sugar€substitute.€€Furthermore,€aspartameĻmay€actually€increase€your€appetite€(Farber€52).Ģą  ąWhile€FDA€approval€may€signal€the€green€light€for€safe€consumption,€85€percent€of€allĻcomplaints€registered€with€the€FDA€are€for€adverse€reactions€to€aspartame,€including€fiveĻreported€deaths€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€la).€€A€closer€look€at€the€unscientific€studies,€suspiciousŠ ūK Šapproval€methods,€and€its€harmful€ingredients,€reveal€the€hidden€dangers€of€this€artificialĻsweetener.€€In€reality,€aspartame€poses€a€public€health€threat.€€Letššs€examine€the€following€threeĻmyths€to€conclude€why€you€should€avoid€aspartame:€first,€FDA€approval€means€aspartame€is€safeĻto€consume;€second,€œits›€natural€ingredients€imply€š šnot€harmfulšš;€and€third,€it€helps€controlĻweight€gain.ĢĢņņFDA€Approval€Means€SafeŠ ń&A"% Šóóą  ąš šAspartame€was€the€most€œstudied›€additive€ever€approved€by€the€Food€and€DrugŠ Ė($' ŠAdministration,šš€argues€Martha€Stone,€Nutrition€Advisor€and€professor€at€Colorado€StateŠ „*õ%) ŠUniversity.€€Stone,€an€advocate€for€aspartame,€claims€that€š šaspartame€wouldnššt€have€gotten€toĻthe€market€if€it€caused€problems€in€humansšš€(qtd.€In€Castrone€12D).€€Does€š šmost€studiedšš€implyĻsafe€for€human€consumption?€€More€importantly,€what€were€the€results€of€these€studies€and€howĻwas€aspartame€approved?€€An€in€depth€look€at€the€history€of€aspartame€approval€reveals€a€trail€ofĻsuspicious€methods€and€possible€collusion€between€the€FDA€and€the€G.€D.€Searle€company,Ļmanufacturer€of€aspartame.Ģą  ąAspartame€was€discovered€in€1965€by€a€chemist€from€the€Searle€company€(Farber€53).€ĻAfter€researching€their€product€to€determine€its€safety,€Searle€submitted€tests€to€the€FDA€for€theĻapproval€of€aspartame.€€According€to€ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó,€compiled€by€the€AspartameŠ €Š ŠConsumer€Safety€Network,€the€FDA€approved€aspartame€in€1974€for€limited€use€based€on€theĻtests€selected€by€Searle.€€After€the€approval,€the€FDA€learned€that€some€of€Searleššs€otherĻproducts€had€serious€side€effects.€€Also,€a€study€done€by€Dr.€John€Olney,€research€psychiatristĻfrom€the€Washington€School€of€Medicine,€revealed€that€holes€in€the€brains€of€mice€appearedĻafter€the€consumption€of€aspartic€acid,€a€major€ingredient€in€aspartame.€€This€study€wasĻsubmitted€to€the€FDA€after€they€had€already€approved€aspartame€for€limited€use.€€This€newĻevidence€prompted€the€FDA€to€organize€an€internal€Task€Force€to€investigate€Searleššs€originalĻresearch€(7„8).Ģą  ąIn€their€investigation,€the€FDA€1975€Task€Force€reviewed€a€study€done€for€Searle€in€1969Ļby€Dr.€Harry€Waisman,€Professor€of€Pediatrics€at€the€University€of€Wisconsin.€€The€studyĻinvolved€feeding€aspartame€mixed€with€milk€to€seven€infant€monkeys.€€After€300€days,€fiveĻmonkeys€had€gran€mal€seizures€and€one€died.€€Dr.€Waisman€died€before€all€of€his€studies€wereĻcompleted.€€The€Task€Force€uncovered€that€when€Searle€had€submitted€the€Waisman€study€to€theŠ ’+ā&* ŠFDA,€all€the€negative€data€had€been€omitted€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€6„7).Š ° Šą  ąThe€Task€Force€also€discovered€that€questionable€lab€practices€had€been€performed€byĻresearchers€from€Searle.€€In€a€summary€of€their€investigation,€the€Task€Force€concluded:ĢÓ XÓÓ ĄÓWe€have€uncovered€serious€deficiencies€in€Searleššs€integrity€in€conductingĻhigh€quality€animal€research€to€accurately€determine€or€characterize€the€toxicĻpotential€of€its€products.€.€.€.€The€cumulative€findings€of€problems€within€andĻacross€the€studies€we€investigated€reveal€a€pattern€of€conduct€whichĻcompromises€the€scientific€integrity€of€the€studies.€€(Qtd.€in€ņņThe€DeadlyŠ ¦ö  ŠDeceptionóó€8„9).Š €Š ŠÓ XÓÓ ĄÓThis€investigation€revealed€that€Searle€researchers€had€cut€out€tumors€in€animals€that€had€beenĻfed€aspartame€and€neglected€to€report€all€of€them€or€check€for€cancer.€€Also,€animals€that€wereĻš šreported€as€dead,€were€later€reported€alive€againšš€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€9).Š ^ Šą  ąOther€findings€of€the€Task€Force€included€š šfalsified€datašš€from€another€Searle€product,Ļthe€Copper€7„IUD,€a€birth€control€device.€€This€product€had€to€be€pulled€off€the€shelves€due€to€aĻ$9,000,000€lawsuit.€€Searle€lost€even€though€they€claimed€the€IUD€was€safe€(ņņThe€DeadlyŠ œģ ŠDeceptionóó€8).Š v Ę Šą  ąAs€a€result€of€the€findings€of€the€1975€Task€Force,€a€smaller€Task€Force€was€assigned€inĻ1977€to€investigate€Searleššs€original€research€even€further.€€This€investigation€uncovered€thatĻSearle€had€again€falsified€data€by€submitting€inaccurate€blood€tests.€€Apparently,€they€hadĻsubstituted€unrelated€animal€tests€because€of€instrument€problems.€€In€another€study,€a€closerĻlook€revealed€that€uterine€tumors€had€developed€in€some€test€animals.€€Searle€š šadmittedšš€thatĻthese€tumors€were€related€to€the€ingestion€of€a€breakdown€product€of€aspartame,Š ’+ā&* ŠDiketopiperazine€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€10).Š ° Šą  ąDue€to€the€1977€Task€Force€findings,€FDA€ordered€a€grand€jury€investigation€of€SearleššsĻaspartame€studies.€€Assistant€U.S.€Attorney,€William€Conlon,€and€U.S.€Attorney,€ThomasĻSullivan,€failed€to€start€any€legal€action€against€Searle€concerning€aspartame€testing.€ĻConsequently,€time€ran€out€and€the€grand€jury€investigation€terminated.€€Conlon€was€then€hiredĻby€the€law€firm€that€represented€Searle.€€It€is€interesting€to€œnote›€that€this€was€not€the€first€timeĻSearle€had€been€involved€in€a€grand€jury€investigation.€€They€had€been€accused€of€unreportedĻtumors€in€the€testing€of€their€two€drugs,€Flagyl€and€Aldactone€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€10„11).Š ¦ö  Šą  ąAccording€to€an€article€in€ņņTechnology€Reviewóó,€aspartame€came€up€for€approval€again€inŠ €Š Š1980.€€This€time€the€FDA€recommended€that€a€Public€Board€œof€Inquiry€be€created€to€determineĻaspartameššs€safety.€€The€Board€was›€composed€of€three€scientists.€€They€š šrecommended€keepingĻaspartame€off€the€market€until€further€animal€tests€could€show€that€it€did€not€cause€tumorsššĻ(Farber€53).Ģą  ąThe€disapproval€of€aspartame€by€the€Public€Board€of€Inquiry€wasnššt€enough.€€ņņThe€DeadlyŠ Ā ŠDeceptionóó€states€that€a€five€member€Commissionerššs€Team€of€Scientists€was€then€formed€toŠ œģ Šlook€at€the€results€of€the€Public€Board€of€Inquiry€conclusions.€€Three€scientists€voted€againstĻapproval€and€two€scientists€voted€for€approval.€€Inexplicably,€a€sixth€member€joined€the€teamĻwith€a€vote€of€š šyesšš€to€the€approval€of€aspartame€creating€a€deadlock.€€Dr.€Goyan,€the€FDAĻCommissioner,€decided€not€to€approve€aspartame€at€this€time€(13,€16).Ģą  ąIn€April€of€1981,€Dr.€Arthur€Hayes€became€the€new€Commissioner.€€Searle€applied€againĻfor€approval€of€aspartame.€€A€few€months€later,€Dr.€Hayes€approved€aspartame€for€use€in€dryĻfoods.€€In€1983,€he€approved€aspartame€for€use€in€diet€soft€drinks€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€14„15).€Š ’+ā&* ŠOne€month€later,€Dr.€Hayes€left€the€FDA€and€within€three€months€he€was€working€for€SearleššsĻadvertising€agency,€Burson„Marsteller€(Farber€53).Ģą  ąAspartameššs€history€of€approval€speaks€for€itself.€€The€Searle€company,€whose€sales€wereĻ700€million€in€1992€(Therrien€42),€had€much€to€gain€from€the€approval€of€aspartame.€€AfterĻresearching€their€own€product,€Searle€selectively€chose€the€tests€and€then€submitted€them€to€theĻFDA.€€How€can€Searle,€the€company€who€stands€to€profit,€determine€which€reports€are€to€beĻgiven€to€the€FDA?€€An€instant€bias€is€created€when€this€is€allowed€to€happen.€€Even€whenĻindependent€researchers,€such€as€Olney€and€Waisman,€were€approached€by€Searle€to€conductĻsafety€tests,€Searle€withheld€important€information€that€these€researchers€had€discovered.€€TheĻSearle€companyššs€effort€to€produce€a€clear€picture€on€the€safety€of€aspartame€is€at€best€a€weakĻattempt.€€Falsified€data,€unscientific€lab€practices,€and€a€history€of€problems€with€some€of€theirĻother€products€makes€it€hard€to€believe€that€Searleššs€concern€for€the€publicššs€health€takesĻprecedence€over€financial€gains.Ģą  ąThe€FDA€should€be€the€objective€source€to€verify€if€Searleššs€research€is€valid.€€The€FDAĻhas€the€final€approval€and€the€public€depends€on€them€to€determine€the€safety€of€a€product.€€InĻthis€particular€case,€the€repeated€reviewing€of€aspartame€studies€by€forming€two€task€forces,€aĻPublic€Board€of€Inquiry,€and€two€teams€of€scientists€seems€redundant€if€not€suspicious.€€TheĻresearch€indicating€tumors€and€falsifying€of€data€resurfaced€every€time.€€It€appears€that€all€ofĻthese€attempts€were€to€ultimately€get€aspartame€approved,€not€to€determine€itššs€safety.€€If€theĻFDA€had€been€really€concerned,€they€should€have€insisted€on€reviewing€all€of€the€originalĻresearch€before€it€was€approved€for€limited€use€in€1974.€€Even€if€the€FDAššs€repeated€attempts€toĻinvestigate€aspartameššs€safety€were€legitimate,€ultimately,€it€was€Commissioner€œHayesšš›Š ’+ā&* Šresponsibility€to€determine€if€this€product€should€enter€the€market.€€When€he€approvedĻaspartame,€it€was€more€than€questionable€if€his€intentions€were€sincere.€€His€employment€œwith›ĻFDA€was€just€long€enough€to€get€aspartame€approved€and€then€he€conveniently€quit€and€wasĻhired€by€a€Searle€related€company!€€How€can€we€rely€on€the€FDA€to€make€the€right€decisionsĻconcerning€aspartame€approval€if€we€are€suspicious€of€their€motives?Ģą  ąHow€does€all€this€relate€to€the€safety€of€aspartame?€€First€we€must€explore€what€safeĻmeans.€€The€FDA€defines€safe€as€a€š šreasonable€certainty€of€no€harmšš€(Farber€48).€€SearleššsĻevaluation€of€aspartameššs€safety€was€compromised€when€they€withheld€negative€data€andĻsupplied€inaccurate€test€results.€€Without€valid€research,€š šreasonable€certainty€of€no€harmšš€isĻdifficult€to€determine.€€How€can€aspartame€be€on€the€market€if€the€FDA€and€Searle€failed€toĻdetermine€whether€it€was€safe€or€not?Ģą  ąBrain€tumors€and€seizures€in€aspartame„fed€animals€indicate€a€possible€risk€to€humans.€ĻThe€dictionary€definition€of€safe€means€š šnot€presenting€or€involving€any€danger€or€riskššĻ(ņņWebsterššsóó€877).€€Does€this€mean€aspartame€is€not€safe?€€The€answer€lies€in€the€hands€of€theŠ Ā Špublic.€€Although€aspartame€was€not€tested€on€humans€before€its€approval,€it€now€has€beenĻtested€on€the€public€by€default.€€Over€200€million€Americans€consume€aspartame€productsĻ(Weininger€1/ZZ1).€€We€have€been€the€guinea€pigs€in€the€testing€of€aspartame€without€evenĻknowing€it.€€A€look€at€aspartameššs€ingredients€and€its€devastating€effects€on€human€beingsĻprovide€the€evidence€for€avoiding€all€aspartame€products.€€ĢĢņņNatural€Ingredients€Imply€š šNot€HarmfulššóóŠ ø)%( Šą  ąš šThe€building€blocks€of€proteinšš€and€š šyour€body€cannot€distinguish€between€the€aminoŠ ’+ā&* Šacids€in€aspartame€and€milkšš€(Deskins€G1)€are€common€phrases€used€to€describe€the€ingredientsĻin€aspartame.€€These€analogies€are€used€to€convince€the€public€that€aspartame€is€as€safe€as€milk,Ļor€other€protein€foods.€€According€to€Dr.€H.€J.€Roberts,€who€was€listed€in€š šThe€Best€Doctors€inĻthe€U.S.,šš€it€is€true€that€aspartame€is€composed€of€the€same€amino€acids€that€can€be€found€inĻprotein€foods.€€However,€there€are€only€two€amino€acids,€phenylalanine€and€aspartic€acid,€thatĻare€in€aspartame€while€protein€foods€contain€many€different€amino€acids.€€When€aspartame€isĻingested,€it€floods€the€bloodstream€with€these€two€amino€acids€while€protein€foods,€on€the€otherĻhand,€have€other€amino€acids€which€š šneutralizešš€and€eliminate€this€sudden€flooding€(30).€€LikeĻtaking€words€out€of€context,€taking€amino€acids€out€of€their€natural€form€might€cause€problems.€ĻA€closer€look€at€aspartameššs€ingredients€and€the€adverse€reactions€reported€by€thousands€ofĻpeople€reveal€the€dangers€of€this€artificial€sweetener.Ģą  ąDr.€Roberts€states€in€his€book,€ņņAspartame€Is€it€Safe?óó,€that€aspartameššs€three€componentsŠ ^ Šare€phenylalanine€(50€percent),€aspartic€acid€(40€percent),€and€methanol€(10€percent).€€WhenĻaspartame€is€exposed€to€heat€or€prolonged€storage,€it€breaks€down€into€metabolites.€€œOne€›of€theseĻbreakdown€products€is€Diketopiperazine,€a€toxic€metabolite€that€is€not€usually€found€in€our€diet.€ĻThe€effects€of€these€different€metabolites€are€unknown€(27,€38„40).Ģą  ąAccording€to€an€article€in€ņņConsumer€Reportsóó,€food€and€beverages€containingŠ P"   Šphenylalanine,€the€major€ingredient€in€aspartame,€must€be€labeled€due€to€the€genetic€disorder,Ļphenylketonuria€(PKU).€€The€U.S.€carries€a€warning€on€all€aspartame€products€to€alert€peopleĻwith€PKU€(580).€€People€with€this€genetic€disorder€lack€the€enzyme€needed€to€metabolizeĻphenylalanine€and€therefore€it€š šaccumulatesšš€in€the€body€and€can€š šcause€œsevere›€mentalĻretardationšš€(Roberts€33).€€According€to€Steven€Farber,€Ph.D.€candidate€in€brain€and€cognitiveŠ ’+ā&* Šsciences€at€Massachusetts€Institute€of€Technology,€there€are€an€š šestimated€10€million€peopleĻwho€are€carriers€and€may€not€know€it.šš€€He€states€that€these€PKU€carriers€are€also€at€risk€becauseĻš šthey€cannot€degrade€phenylalanine€as€effectively€as€normal€individuals€and€may€be€sensitive€toĻincreased€levels€in€their€dietsšš€(48).Ģą  ąPhenylketonurics€and€PKU€carriers€are€not€the€only€people€that€should€avoidĻphenylalanine.€€Dr.€Louis€J.€Elsas,€II,€Director€of€Medical€Genetics€at€Emory€University€SchoolĻof€Medicine,€š šrecommends€that€pregnant€women€avoid€aspartame€sweetenersšš€because€it€isĻunknown€what€quantity€is€considered€safe€(qtd.€ņņIn€Assc.€Of€Birth€Defect€Childrenóó€2).€€Dr.Š ¦ö  ŠRoberts€also€suggests€to€avoid€aspartame€products€during€pregnancy€due€to€increased€levels€ofĻphenylalanine€on€the€š šfetal€side€of€the€placenta.šš€€Increases€levels€of€phenylalanine€mayĻš šinterfere€with€the€growth€of€the€fetus€brainšš€(181).Ģą  ąIn€an€article€published€in€the€ņņAssociation€of€Birth€Defect€Childrenóó,€Karen€Mills€arguesŠ ^ Šthat€aspartame€may€be€responsible€for€her€sonššs€health€problems.€€Unaware€of€the€dangers€ofĻaspartame,€she€consumed€four€to€six€diet€sodas€a€day€and€also€took€phenylalanine€capsules€toĻrelieve€fatigue€during€her€pregnancy.€€She€was€in€good€health€and€did€not€smoke€or€drink€duringĻthis€time.€€Her€pregnancy€was€considered€normal€and€prenatal€testing€ruled€out€any€genetic€birthĻdefects.€€Her€delivery€was€also€normal.€€When€her€son€Brandon€was€born,€he€was€œseverelyńöń,ńöń›Ļretarded€with€serious€neurological€problems.€€All€of€his€x„rays,€genetic€studies,€and€blood€testsĻcame€back€normal.€€Karen€states,€š šI€am€suspicious€that€NutraSweetš)š€could€be€a€contributingĻfactor€in€Brandonššs€situation€since€there€are€no€physical€or€genetic€causes€revealed€for€hisĻneurological€problemsšš€(2).Ģą  ąAspartic€acid€(aspartame)€and€glutamate€(ingredient€in€monosodium€glutamate)€haveŠ ’+ā&* Šbeen€labeled€as€excitotoxins,€which€Dr.€Russell€Blaylock,€author€of€ņņExcitotoxins:€The€Taste€ThatŠ ° ŠKillsóó,€defines€as€š ša€group€of€excitatory€amino€acids€that€can€cause€sensitive€neurons€to€dieššŠ ŠŚ Š(226).€€An€article€in€the€ņņOrlando€Sentinel€Tribuneóó€states,€š šaccording€to€Blaylock,€a€single€mealŠ d“ Šmay€contain€several€of€these€additives€.€.€.€given€a€high€enough€dose€can€include€brain€lesions.šš€ĻBlaylock€is€concerned€that€š šhundreds€of€millions€of€infants€and€young€children€are€at€great€riskĻand€their€parents€are€not€even€aware€of€itšš€(qtd.€In€Bonvie€and€Bonvie€G1).Ģą  ąThe€last€component€of€aspartame€is€methanol,€better€known€as€wood€alcohol,€a€š šdeadlyĻpoison,šš€claims€Dr.€Roberts.€€The€Environmental€Protection€Agency€recommends€less€than€eightĻmilligrams€per€day€of€methanol.€€A€typical€liter€of€an€aspartame€diet€soda€containsĻapproximately€55€milligrams.€€Complications€of€methanol€poisoning€include€blindness,€brainĻswelling,€pancreatitis,€numbness,€shooting€pains,€cardiac€changes,€and€death€(28,€42„45).€ĻAccording€to€Aspartame€Consumer€Safety€Network,€when€ingested,€methanol€breaks€down€intoĻformaldehyde,€š šknown€to€cause€cancer,€accumulating€slowly€without€detection€in€the€bodyššĻ(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€2).Š Ā Šą  ąEric€Soto€was€a€victim€of€methanol€poisoning.€€In€1989,€when€Eric€was€diagnosed€withĻdiabetes,€he€started€consuming€aspartame€products€to€avoid€sugar.€€Soon€after,€Eric€complainedĻof€numbness€in€his€fingers.€€After€seeing€a€doctor€for€this€problem,€it€was€suggested€that€he€haveĻsurgery€to€correct€a€wrist€nerve.€€Before€he€went€in€for€surgery,€a€black€spot€appeared€over€hisĻleft€eye.€€After€being€examined€by€an€opthamologist,€Eric€was€admitted€to€the€hospital€forĻpossible€methanol€poisoning.€€He€decided€to€stop€using€aspartame€products€after€hearing€aboutĻthe€dangers€from€a€friend.€€The€damage€to€Ericššs€eyes€was€permanent,€but€the€numbness€in€hisĻfingers€stopped€even€though€doctors€said€it€could€only€be€corrected€by€surgery€(ņņThe€DeadlyŠ ’+ā&* ŠDeceptionóó€B4).Š ° Šą  ąEric€Soto€is€not€the€only€person€to€suffer€from€aspartame€related€health€problems.€€MaryĻStoddard,€president€of€Aspartame€Consumer€Safety€Network,€claims€that€nearly€œ10,00ń÷ń0ń÷ń›Ļcomplaints€have€been€reported€to€this€non„profit€organization.€€The€following€symptoms€areĻlisted€on€the€Aspartame€Consumer€Safety€Network€Fact€Sheet:ĢÓ ĄÓÓ XÓheadaches,€nausea,€vertigo,€insomnia,€numbness,€blurred€vision,€blindnessĻand€other€eye€problems,€memory€loss,€slurred€speech,€depression,€personalityĻchanges,€hyperactivity,€stomach€disorders,€œseizureńųńsńųń,›€skin€lesions,€rashes,Ļanxiety€attacks,€muscle€cramping€and€joint€pain,€loss€of€energy,€symptomsĻmimicking€heart€attacks,€hearing€loss€and€ear€ringing,€and€loss€or€change€ofĻtaste.€(ņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó€1).Š 4„ ŠÓ X…KÓÓ ĄwKÓIncluded€in€these€complaints€are€š šhundreds€of€pilots€who€have€reported€life€threatening€adverseĻreactions€due€to€aspartame,šš€according€to€Aspartame€Consumer€Safety€Network,€in€an€articleĻfrom€ņņGeneral€Aviation€Newsóó.€€Michael€Collins,€former€pilot,€suffered€from€seizures€whenever€heŠ Ā Šdrank€diet€soda.€€When€he€stopped€using€aspartame€products,€he€remained€seizure„free.€ĻUnfortunately,€he€lost€his€medical€certification€and€can€no€longer€fly€(qtd.€in€Hicks€2).Ģą  ąWhile€seizures€are€common€among€aspartame€users,€headaches€are€the€most€commonĻcomplaint€(Roberts€95).€€According€to€Caroline€B.€Kline,€nutrition€consultant,€eighteen€millionĻAmericans€suffer€from€migraines.€€In€her€magazine€article,€š šMigraine€œMakeńłńrńłńs,šš›€she€suggests€thatĻdiet€could€be€one€of€the€causes€of€these€severe€headaches.€€Aspartame€was€listed€as€possibleĻculprit€(207).Ģą  ąAmericans€are€not€the€only€people€worried€about€the€safety€of€aspartame.€€In€1988,€theŠ ’+ā&* ŠMexican€government€issued€a€detailed€warning€to€be€put€on€diet€sodas€that€contain€aspartameĻ(Bouleau€66).€€The€label€on€these€diet€sodas€reads:ĢÓ ĄÓÓ XÓThis€product€should€not€be€consumed€by€individuals€who€are€allergic€toĻphenylalanine.€€Consumption€by€pregnant€women€and€children€under€7€is€notĻrecommended.€€Users€should€follow€a€balanced€diet.€€Consumption€byĻdiabetics€must€be€authorized€by€a€physician,€(Bouleau€66).ĢÓ XRÓÓ ĄRÓIf€a€product€has€to€have€this€many€warnings,€how€can€it€possibly€be€on€the€market?Ģą  ąThe€FDA€has€the€answer.€€Thomas€Wilcox,€FDA€spokesman,€claims€that€š šsome€peopleĻdonššt€tolerate€aspartame,€but€the€reports€to€the€FDA€arenššt€sufficient€to€warrant€a€change€in€theĻproductššs€classification.€.€.€.€Unless€there€is€shown€to€be€some€very€common€serious€effect€.€.€.Ļyou€donššt€want€to€deprive€the€entire€population€of€the€productšš€(qtd.€in€Bonvie€and€Bonvie€G1).€ĻHow€serious€do€the€side€effects€have€to€be€and€how€many€people€have€to€be€affected€before€thisĻproduct€is€pulled€off€the€market?€€When€you€start€to€add€up€the€Phenylketonurics,€the€10€millionĻPKU€carriers,€migraine€sufferers,€diabetics,€children,€and€pregnant€women,€who€are€all€possibleĻvictims€of€aspartame€poisoning,€it€seems€significant€enough€to€ban€the€use€of€aspartame.€€DonšštĻthese€people€who€are€at€risk€or€have€already€suffered€count?€€Depriving€people€of€their€healthĻseems€more€serious€than€š šdepriving€the€entire€populationšš€of€a€sugar€substitute.Ģą  ąWhat€about€the€people€who€assume€aspartame€is€safe?€€Is€it€fair€to€put€these€people€atĻrisk?€€Even€cigarettes€and€drugs€have€warnings€on€them€to€alert€the€public€of€possible€sideĻeffects€and€dangers.€€Aspartame€only€has€one€warning€for€PKU.€€How€can€people€make€a€wiseĻchoice€if€they€arenššt€even€warned€of€the€dangers?€€The€warning€label€would€have€to€be€a€veryĻlengthy€to€properly€warn€all€people.€€The€only€solution€is€to€stop€aspartame€consumption€byŠ ’+ā&* Špulling€it€off€the€market.€€This€would€prevent€people€from€unnecessary€harm,€especially€thoseĻwho€are€unaware€of€the€dangers.Ģą  ąEven€if€you€are€aware€of€the€dangers€and€are€trying€to€avoid€aspartame,€you€might€haveĻto€spend€more€time€reading€labels.€€The€familiar€NutraSweetš)š€logo€might€not€appear€on€allĻaspartame€products.€€The€patent€on€aspartame€held€by€Searle€expired€in€December€of€1992,Ļallowing€other€companies€besides€the€NutraSweetš)š€Company€to€produce€aspartame€(TherrienĻ42).€€(NutraSweetš)š€Co.€and€G.€D.€Searle€are€divisions€of€the€Monsanto€Company).€€The€onlyĻclue€now€on€some€products€is€š šaspartamešš€listed€in€the€ingredients€and€a€phenylalanine€warning.Ģą  ąIf€youššre€still€not€convinced€by€the€tainted€history€of€aspartame€or€its€harmful€ingredientsĻand€are€using€it€to€help€control€your€weight,€think€again.€€Studies€show€that€this€may€not€be€theĻcase.ĢĢņņHelps€Control€Weight€GainóóŠ č8 Šą  ąš šI€drank€diet€soda€for€the€obvious€reason„„to€avoid€sugar€and€to€avoid€weight€gainššĻclaims€a€businesswoman€in€a€case€reported€to€Dr.€Roberts€(qtd.€In€Roberts€147).€€Itššs€not€unusualĻfor€people€who€are€dieting€to€reach€for€an€aspartame€product€verses€a€product€containing€sugar.€ĻAspartame€is€š š200€times€sweeteršš€than€ordinary€sugar€so€fewer€calories€are€consumed€(DeskinsĻG1).€€With€a€weight€conscious€society,€fewer€calories€can€be€attractive.€€However,€a€closer€lookĻshows€that€aspartame€may€not€help€control€weight€gain.Ģą  ąOutlined€in€the€following€list€are€some€reasons€why€aspartame€might€not€be€effective€inĻcontrolling€weight:ĢÓ HÓÓ ’Ó1.€€According€to€an€article€in€ņņTechnology€Reviewóó,€š šaspartame€may€actually€stimulateŠ ’+ā&* Šappetite€and€bring€on€a€craving€for€carbohydratesšš€(Farber€52).Ģ2.€An€article€in€ņņUtne€Readeróó€claims,€š šresearchers€believe€that€any€kind€of€sweet€tasteŠ ŠŚ Šsignals€body€cells€to€store€carbohydrates€and€fats,€which€in€turn€causes€the€body€toĻcrave€more€foodšš€(Lamb€16).Ģ3.€€From€the€ņņSan€Francisco€Chronicleóó,€Jean€Weininger€states€that€š šstudies€have€shownŠ  h Šthat€people€who€use€artificial€sweeteners€donššt€necessarily€reduce€their€consumptionĻof€sugar€„„€or€their€total€calorie€intake.€.€.€.€Having€a€diet€soda€makes€it€okay€to€eat€aĻdouble€cheeseburger€and€a€chocolate€mousse€piešš€(1/ZZ1).Ģ4.€€š šThe€American€Cancer€Society€(1986)€documented€the€fact€that€persons€usingĻartificial€sweeteners€gain€more€weight€than€those€who€avoid€themšš€(Roberts€150).ĢÓ ’Ä_ÓÓ H¶_Óą  ąWhether€you€are€trying€to€lose€pounds€or€maintain€your€weight,€using€an€artificialĻsweetener€such€as€aspartame€does€not€seem€to€have€any€significant€effect€on€weight€control.€ĻThose€extra€calories€you€saved€by€drinking€a€diet€pop€wonššt€make€much€of€a€difference€if€youĻstill€need€to€satisfy€your€hunger€and€indulge€in€several€cookies€later.€€If€it€is€actually€increasingĻœńśńyour€ńśńappetite,›€why€use€it?€€Common€sense€tells€you€that€proper€diet€and€exercise€are€moreĻbeneficial.€€Even€if€you€believe€that€aspartame€may€aid€in€dieting,€is€this€worth€risking€yourĻhealth?Ģą  ąFDA€approval€and€natural€ingredients€may€signal€safety€at€first,€but€the€mountingĻevidence€against€aspartame€reveals€many€hidden€dangers€and€possible€risks.€€If€you€areĻexperiencing€any€of€the€adverse€reactions,€stop€using€aspartame€and€see€if€the€symptomsĻdisappear.€€Now€that€you€are€aware€of€the€problems€with€aspartame,€inform€others€of€theĻsymptoms€of€aspartame€poisoning.€€Notify€the€FDA€of€any€adverse€reactions€that€you€mayŠ ’+ā&* Šexperience€and€encourage€others€to€do€the€same.€€Donššt€just€stop€using€aspartame,€but€make€aĻdifference€by€returning€any€aspartame€products€you€may€now€have.€€If€sales€go€down,€hopefullyĻaspartame€will€be€pulled€off€the€market€and€put€an€end€to€the€aspartame€dilemma.Š  d“ ŠÓ  ÓńńÓfęÓńńńńńńÓ3óÓńńńńBIBLIOGRAPHYĢÓ  Óą0  ąą ° ąņņAssociation€of€Birth€Defect€Childrenóó.€€š šThe€Aspartame€Controversy.šš€€14€Fall€1989:€1„2.ŠrĀ(#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąBlaylock,€Russell€L.€€ņņExcitotoxins:€The€Taste€That€Killsóó.€€Santa€Fe:€Health€Press,€1994.Š4„(#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąBonvie,€Bill€and€Linda.€€š šWhatššs€Eating€Kids?€€Maybe€Itššs€Their€Diets.šš€€ņņOrlando€SentinelŠ ö F ŠTribuneóó€12€Mar.€1995:€G1.Šø (#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąBouleau,€Cecilia.€€š šDiet€Coke€Changes€as€Mexico€Officials€Sour€on€Saccharin.šš€€ņņAdvertisingŠ z Ź  ŠAgeóó€23€May€1988:€66.Š<Œ (#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąCastrone,€Linda.€€š šFavorable€Research€Sweetens€Aspartame.šš€€ņņRocky€Mountain€Newsóó€24€Aug.Š žN  Š1994,€ņņEd.€F:€12D.ŠĄ(#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąConsumeróó€Reports.€€š šA€Question€of€Health.šš€€Sept.€1993:€580.Š‚Ņ(#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąņņThe€Deadly€Deceptionóó.€€Aspartame€Consumer€Safety€Network.€€Dallas:€1994.ŠD”(#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąDeskins,€Barbara.€€š šAspartame€Isnššt€Linked€to€Cancer.šš€€ņņPittsburgh€Post„Gazetteóó€21€Aug.€1994;Š V ŠG1.Š (#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąFarber,€Steven€A.€€š šThe€Price€of€Sweetness.šš€€Technology€Review€Jan.€1990:€46„53.Š (#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąHicks,€Megan.€€š šNutraSweetš)š.€.€.Too€Good€to€be€True?šš€€ņņGeneral€Aviation€Newsóó€31€Jul.€1989:Š Lœ Š2.Š (#(# ŠKline,€Caroline€B.€€š šMigraine€Makers.šš€€ņņLadies€Home€Journalóó€Oct.€1994:€207.Š Š   Šą0  ąą ° ąLamb,€Lynette.€€š šJust€a€Spoonful€of€Aspartame.šš€€ņņUtne€Readeróó€œJuly/Auńūńfńūńńüńgńüń.›€1988:€16„17.Š’"ā"(#(# ŠRoberts,€H.J.€€ņņAspartame€(NutraSweetš)š)€Is€it€Safe?óó.€€Philadelphia:€The€Charles€Press,€1990.Š T$¤$ ŠStoddard,€Mary.€€Personal€phone€interview.€€March€1995.Ģą0  ąą ° ąTherrien,€Lois.€€š šHow€Sweet€it€Isnššt€at€NutraSweet.šš€€ņņBusiness€Weekóó€14€Dec.€1992:€42.ŠŲ'(#((#(# Šą0  ąą ° ąņņWebsterššs€Dictionaryóó.€€Encyclopedic€Edition.€€New€York:€Lexicon€Publications,€Inc.,€1989.Šš)ź$*(#(# ŠWeininger,€Jean.€€š šSweet€Talk.šš€€ņņThe€San€Francisco€Chronicleóó€4€Jan.€1995,€final€ed.:€1/ZZ1.